University of Tokyo

Abstract
Survey Number 1477
Survey Title A Web Survey on the Advancement and Diversification of Lawyering in Criminal Justice Areas, 2020
Depositor Research Group on Lawyering in Criminal Justice Areas
Restriction of Use For detailed information, please refer to 'For Data Users' at SSJDA website.

- Apply to SSJDA. SSJDA's approval is required.
Educational Purpose Available for both research and instructional purposes.
Period of Data Use Permission One year
Access to Datasets Download
SSJDA Data Analysis Not available
Examples of Citations and Acknowledgments When presenting the results of the secondary analysis, please specify the source of the individual data used by including the following sentence:

The data for this secondary analysis, "A Web Survey on the Advancement and Diversification of Lawyering in Criminal Justice Areas, 2020, (Research Group on Lawyering in Criminal Justice Areas)" was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives, Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo.
https://doi.org/10.34500/SSJDA.1477

*In cases where you have used multiple surveys from the same series, you can shorten the sentence by focusing only on the series name or by grouping the survey years together. If you have any questions, please contact us.
E-mail: ssjda@iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Summary It is a legal, sociological task to analyze how changes in criminal defense are affected by various conditions under the various reforms in the field of criminal justice introduced by the judicial system reform and to examine the conditions necessary for future ideal development.
Under the theme of "A Comprehensive Analysis of the Diversification and Sophistication of Lawyers' Activities in the Criminal Field," this survey was conducted to gain a general understanding of the overall structure of lawyers' activities in Japan and the criminal field as a whole. The results of the preceding interview survey were used as a reference in setting the questions.
Data Type quantitative research: micro data
Universe Attorneys practicing as of the end of December 2019
Unit of Observation Individual
Sample Size Sample size: 914(number of questionnaires sent: 4,672, response rate: 19.6%)
Date of Collection 2020-03-27 ~ 2020-04-18
2020/03/27-2020/04/18
Time Period 2020 ~ 2020
Spatial Unit All over Japan
Sampling Procedure The Japan Federation of Bar Associations provided a list of registered lawyers (42,058 persons) stratified by gender and selected using sampling at regular intervals.
A total of 4,672 persons (3,786 males and 886 females) were selected.
Mode of Data Collection Internet survey (send a request form and answer the questions online)
Investigator
Criminal Lawyers' Activity Study Group, conducted by Central Research Service Co.
DOI https://doi.org/10.34500/SSJDA.1477
Sponsors (Funds)
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(B) 18H00803
Related Publications (by the Investigator) Please refer to the abstract in Japanese.
Related Publications (based on Secondary Analysis) List of related publications (based on Secondary Analysis)
Documentation Questionnaire
Major Survey Items (1) About Law Firms
Status of lawyer registration, reasons for not being registered, type of firm
Number of lawyers in the firm as a whole, whether the firm has a head office or branch office, number of lawyers assigned to the firm, number of lawyers in the firm, management style, current position
Media used by your firm/respondent to advertise your business, the information you provided about your firm/yourself
Effects and adverse effects of providing information via the Internet and future intentions

(2) Status of engagement in the criminal field
Status of engagement in criminal law practice, hours of activity, percentage of work, percentage of work in each field, and reasons for time spent in criminal law practice
The time when they became interested in human rights issues and the time when they became interested in the skills required for the field of law
The existence or non-existence of training courses on criminal law, sponsoring organizations, existence or non-existence of educational opportunities, participation in criminal law committees, intention regarding workload (criminal defense, support for victims of crimes)
The presence or absence of a contract with “Houterasu,” the presence or absence of a list of applicants for a case
Experience in recommending silence during the investigation stage, the experience of requesting the presence of defense counsel, and experience requesting audio/visual recordings of interrogations
Experience and maximum number of days of being in charge of defense in a jury trial, the experience and maximum number of days of being in charge of victim's counsel in a jury trial, the experience of obtaining an acquittal, number of cases in hand in the field of criminal law
Cooperation with other lawyers, opinions on the future of criminal defense, expertise of the lawyer, and local conditions (criminal defense, defense work in jury trials)

(3) Evaluation of each field
High level of intellectual and technical difficulty, significant social significance, high profitability, respected by many other lawyers, respected by many other attorneys
Note) The applicable fields are traffic accidents, medical accidents, consumer issues, wills and inheritance, environmental and pollution issues, labor issues, corporate mergers and acquisitions, intellectual property, criminal defense, juvenile cases, support for victims of crimes

(4) Professional life
Income from legal services, income from non-lawyer services, percentage of total income from criminal defense, the ratio of court-appointed fees to private-appointed fees, and taxable income
Satisfaction with professional life (general, income, management of working hours, nature of work, social status, economic status, social responsibility, work for the socially vulnerable, independence of work, qualifications, gender equality), anxiety about the future

(5) Work-Life-Balance
Marital status, spouse's occupation, number of household family members, difficulty in finding time for housework, child care, and family care
Time spent on housework/childcare/caregiving, responsibilities for housework, percentage of time spent on housework

(6) Face items
Gender, age, terminal education record, experience of being enrolled in university/graduate school/university school of law
Whether or not the applicant has taken the bar examination, the type of examination, the qualifications for the examination applied for
Legal training experience, term of training
The year and month they first registered as a lawyer, the bar association they belonged to as of the end of last year, and the bar association they belong to now
Full-time occupation immediately prior to registration as a lawyer and type of occupation
Date of Release 2023/07/20
Topics in CESSDA Click here for details

Topics in SSJDA Law
Version 1 : 2023-07-20
Notes for Users